This is the third link that is reminiscent of Malaga Bay (remember the black smokers on the ocean bottom) - see http://phys.org/print303899664.html ... a paper in Nature Geoscience by a team from the Norwegian Geological Survey claims oxygenation of the atmosphere and oceans came about two billion years ago. This also produced phosphorous - and phosphorus was the clue to the findings. Phosphorous is an important ingredient of life and all this popped out when the team were looking at rocks in Karelia (next door to Finland but in Russia) reputed to be two billion years of age.
Malaga Bay also came to mind when I read the headline here too - see http://phys.org/print304016779.html ... microbiologists have found that methanogen microbes can reduce carbon dioxide to methane by a mechanism in which they make 'electrical connections' with other micro organisms, something not recognised in methanogens before. Bacteria anaerobically digest biomass to produce methane gas, an important piece of bio-energy. In nature these methanogens are active in bogs, swamps, and wetland zones, and their productivity is a source of angst to climate alarmists.
I couldn't help thinking of some of Malaga Bay's postings when coming across this at http://phys.org/print303991846.html ... a piece of research on amber deposits. A team of sicentists have analysed modern and fossil resins and the results seem to suggest there was less oxygen in the atmosphere in the geological past than previously imagined. The study therefore raises a question mark about current theories on the evolution of climate and of life itself, including the causes of gigantism in dinosaurs.
Tim Cullen has a post on the Ring Nebula (Messier 57) which provides an example of the fluorescence produced by gases when they are irradiated - with ultra violet light (see http://malagabay.wordpress.com/2013/11/10/fluorescing-skies/ ... complete with images
Meanwhile, at www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?release=2013-323 ... we have atmospheric river storms over the Pacific. These are short lived wind tunnels that carry water vapour from the tropical ocean to mid latitude land ares and are prolific producers of rain and snow in the Americas and East Asia
Cadbury's Milk Tray, brought by a hunk to a swooning lady, was depicted with a selection of hard and soft centres, chocolates to suit any taste. At www.thunderbolts.info/wp/2013/10/09/mired-in-slush-2/ ... it asks, do the centre of planets contain molten magma or a rocky slush? A gravity map of Titan made by the Cassini spacecraft in orbit around Saturn suggests its interior is a mixture of rock and ice with no layering. Variations in the gravity seem to imply a variationin density - unlike the body of Earth's Moon.
Nir Shariv of the Racah Institute of Physics in the Hebrew University of Jerusalem can be seen on video addressing the German EIKE conference on solar and cosmic ray connections with climate physics. This is not to say that what he says is embraced by the sceptic community - only that he offers an alternative view, in one respect, and one that doesn't shirk from the idea of electrical effects on the atmosphere of the Earth. His work is not the same as that of Svensmark, and colleagues, but involves cosmic rays, too.
At http://phys.org/print297254823.html ... computer simulation solves another puzzle. The beginning of the last glacial period required an accumulation of snow at higher latitudes to form the ice sheet that expanded from the poles to cover a vast area of the northern hemisphere. Snow fall is associated with high humidity and moderate temperatures - it is when the rain meets cold air that it turns to snow (as we regularly can see on weather forecasts as produced for television). Snow does not form in the freezing weather, enough to feed a growing glaciation.
This story can be found at http://phys.org/print297435137.html ... and this time it is UK scientists in the chase (based at an observatory in Chile). The 'Dark Energy Survey' is just commencing so no conclusions as yet but the title is the name of the game - finding out why the universe seems to be accelerating instead of closing down due to gravity. The side dish to the plate is to probe the mystery of dark energy, the force that is widely held to be powering the acceleration, overriding gravity.
At http://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2013/09/01/oldbrew-and-tallbloke-why-phi-... ... and http://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2013/09/06/oldbrew-and-tallbloke-why-phi-... ... lots to think about here, a continuing investigation that began with http://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2013/02/20/a-remarkable-discovery-all-sol...
Returning to the theme of Miles Mathis on the Golden Ratio, at http://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2013/08/27/miles-mathis-more-on-the-golde... ... he claims there is often too much math and not enough of mechanics. Instead of looking at it as a field mechanics issue most people analyse it as a pure math problem - and most of the current, and some of the historical math do not add up. He then takes up the theme of modern physics and what he sees as wrong with it - a lack of physicality.
See also http://milesmathis.com/updates.html