At www.livescience.com/21029-cosmic-background-radiation-big-bang.html ... are echoes of the Big Bang misinterpreted? Gerrit Verschuur, author and radio astronomer, has proposed that some of the the fine structures seen in the 'all sky' plot of the universe, and assumed to be cosmic microwave background, is really the imprint of our local interstellar neighbourhood. It has nothing to do with how the universe looked 380,000 thousand years after the Big Bang - the consensus view. It is rather how nearby clouds of of old hydrogen looked just a few hundred years ago.
Some interesting links for thorium energy - another ten years at the earliest. Go to http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/06/07/book-review-of-super-fuel/#more-65191 which is about a book focussing on green energy - including thorium.
Over at Tall Bloke's Talk Shop, blogger Lucy Skywalker of Blackboard fame, has a post on thermal gradients, going back to a friendly discussion between Maxwell and Loschmidt (see http://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2012/05/29/lucy-skywalker-graeffs-second-...). Graeff's paper can be found at http://tallbloke.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/graeff1.pdf and http://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2012/05/03/gravity-induced-atmospheric-te...
At http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2012/05/26/spawar-space-and-naval-warfare-l... EM Smith has been doing some musing on cold fusion after he discovered the US Space and Naval Warfare Command became interested in the subject. He provides a video, an hour long, of the science of cold fusion - as it is currently progressing. EM Smith was impressed and as always sets out to explore the issue a bit and turns his attention to the Rossi E-Cat (much derided by mainstream and in the blogosphere) and alternatives to nickel, coming up with some cheap possibilities.
At http://phys.org/print256538850.html ... Nikdem Poplawski claims every black hole may contain a new universe and he presents this idea as a solution to a number of cosmic mysteries. The mysteries, of course, are manufactured in the minds of cosmologists but Poplawski at least addresses the fundamentals, what caused the Big Bang? The idea our universe, or any universe, is contained within a black hole is one of those super intelligent ideas that sounds completely whacko.
At http://phys.org/print255086031.html ... the solar system, it is thought, is over 4 billion years of age - but its formation may have occurred much quicker than realised, until now. A team of researchers at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, aided by laboratories in Japan and the US, have come to this conclusion as a result of nucleus samarium-146 (146Sm) dating methodology. However, one can see there are a number of caveats - if not elephants in the room.
At www.physorg.com/print253968343.html it is a serious blow to dark matter theories. At www.world-science.net/120417_darkmatter.html the question is - where is the dark matter? not here, befuddled astronomers have discovered, while at www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2012/04/milky-way-appears-to-be-void-of-da... which mor less enscapulates the baffling discovery that dark matter does not exist in our galaxy or solar system - only in deep space (or in the heads of some scientists).
Tall Bloke says at 10.40pm April 12th, 2012 .... solar physicists have a dreadful insecurity problem due to their problems with understanding the Sunb. The gate keepers over compensate for their lack of ability to make useful predictions by attacking all heretics with the energy that arises from their pent up frustration.
There are some fascinating posts on the blog of Tall Bloke over the last few days - see http://tallbloke.wordpress.com or Tall Bloke's Talkshop. For example, on 3rd April and again, on the 5th, some interesting graphs by Vukcevic. Is the Svensmark theory vindicated by what happened during the last couple of weeks, in reference to that huge sunspot and sbusequent solar flare. On the 3rd April the subject is late 20th century warming - has it got it's origins elsewhere and has it nothing to do with co2?
At www.physorg.com/print252580354.html ... the South Pole Telescope is being used to explain the mystery of dark energy. The paper is in the Astrophysical Journal and implies an accelerating universe by means of dark energy and neutrinos - thought to be the most abundant particles in the universe (see also http://arxiv.org/abns/1112.54535 and http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.5775).