This is an interesting development – see https://wattsupwiththat.com/2025/07/18/exposed-from-climategate-to-courtroom-how-climate-activists-tip-the-scales-of-justice/ … an exposure shedding a light on the cozy trist beween judges, climate activists, and so called ethics. Although it is steeped in group think, manipulations, and data gatekeeping in the scientific community, the implications on how the judiciary were targeted, or tempted, is a bombshell exposure. It is the judiciary that decide or issue directives on climate related lawsuits. Why would they not be a target of the climate change lobby. Corruption in high places is coming to light – not just in the US, but in the UK and the West at large. This is another example. Not all the judiciary, of course – but juist enough to push the bar in favour of the climate change money go round.
Keeping that in mind, Robert sent in a link to a podcast – https://corbettreport.com/the-met-office-is-scared-of-ray-sanders/ … the Met Office is scared of Ray Sanders, it is alleged. I don’t think that is necessarily true as the Met Office are entrenched and trusted by a majority of people. It is only those people who bother to delve into the stuff pronounced by the Met Office that are sceptical of their motives. Far from a majority. See my earlier post on Ray Sanders and the ficticious temperature stations used by the Met Office – many of which are closed down, in urban areas, or at airports and other areas where temperatures are subject to outside influence. They, of course, should be scared of him as he is potentially the one person to bring them down. As far as the UK is concerned.